Vasu
Reddy from Chicago
vasureddy@aol.com
Billions
of dollars are spent on US presidential elections. This is just for the president, and untold
amounts are spent on congressional and senate elections. Politics itself is a massive industry (in
every election cycle) as advertisers, promotions, travel, hotels, people,
industrial and human resources, cars, busses, oil and gas, and everything else
in the country is mobilized and paid for by the campaigns. Although the money is raised by the
candidates, it mostly flows back into the economy. It is well accounted for and well spread out
into the nation’s economic system.
Candidates raising money and spending it on bashing each other, is in
one way adding to the economic activity.
Although we don’t hear the coverage on economic impact of raising campaign
money and spending it. With each
election cycle the campaign spending keeps growing (just like our national
debt).
Political
action committees and various loop holes in the system allows for raising huge
campaign contributions and spending by small group of individuals. They also yield massive power in directing
the economic and political direction of the nation. Both the democrats and the republicans, as
simply politicians, who get elected with the help of massive
contributions. That’s the lead for
power, with other people’s money or it really is other people’s power.
Why
are people making massive political contributions? No one gives political contribution just for
the love of politics, they do it to influence an economic and political agenda.
The billions spent on political
campaigns can be spent on education, health, urban development or any other
people related programs, but the political contributions are limitless
outweighing the philanthropic or humanitarian causes. My comments no way ignore the huge
contributions made to humanitarian causes, it is just politics command power
that comes with winning elections, and money has a major part in winning
elections.
In
the 2016 USA presidential election Trump did not need anyone’s money. He started out campaigning that he was going
to self-fund himself, which ended up not being the case. But it was very appealing to have someone run
with own money. The idea was he would
not be indebted to other people’s money.
Trump ended up taking in more money than anyone else, and continues to
take OPM. Although we are only in the
first few months of Trump’s presidency, he has already started raising money
for 2020.
It
is a fact that political agenda will follow the money, and put someone in
power. The more money, the more
opportunity for power. There are
distinct differences between the priorities of political parties and their
ideology, and just about half of the population determines the priorities every
four years. Money that powers the
presidency drives the next four-year agenda.
Nothing drives the national agenda other than the very large amounts of
money.
vasureddy@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment