Vasu
Reddy From Chicago
vasureddy@aol.com
It would be difficult to believe that major business leaders would make large investments without properly thinking through the process of investments. It is also inappropriate to believe that big businesses do not need any help from government in developing the infrastructure they need to continue doing business. While the decision making is normal the moral policing are looking at the market dynamics rather than the decision making of the policy makers. If the government starts to contend that book building can be done without quid pro quo then there will never be big businesses and never be start-up businesses with any potential.
vasureddy@aol.com
Just
about every company that is formed and wants to continue to be in business develops
their plans to build the asset base and raise capital. The founders or promoters of a company
typically plan various levels of raising the capital to meet the demands of
their business plans and after the business takes off the expansion plans and
growth plans. World over the same
exercise of developing plans and raising capital is the most common method of
doing business.
Also
common practices are using contacts to raise private capital. Many times you go to family and friends and
extending the same to their families and friends. Much of the private capital is also raised by
approaching wealthy individuals through contacts. The practice of raising money is similar
world over and especially private capital has a lot to do with who you know and
how to get to them at the right time to seek investments. Also comes with such capital is quid pro quo
of help with other business interests that might have common investors or
common interests. Typically investors
stick to one type of industry so that the help required by one another can be
easily associated through investment or common shareholders.
Private
equity investment is a major part of getting a business ides out to the market
and fostering the viable ideas until they mature into sustainable businesses
which are self funding and profitable, and eventually become public
enterprises. There is a process of value
addition to each stage of the business, and the early participants do benefit
from their risk, and with additional round of funding and business development
the value proposition grows for the early participants. The success of the business is paramount to
protecting the investors and only when the business is a successful enterprise
the investors receive their money back and some, and the rate of success of the
start-ups is not too great the world over.
Irrespective
of the type of kind of investments made, the risk of losing the money far
outweighs the returns, and the percentage of successful enterprises is quite
small. For whatever reason private
investments are made, he investor takes a great risk in placing bets on an
unknown and untested business, purely based on the potential of the business
presented. If an investment is made
based on the favors received then the money is spent in just returning the
favors rather than risking the money. No
real businessman will risk large amounts of money just to return the favors
rather they will just pay for it and get it over with. If a well known and respected industrialist
or industrialists are placing large amounts of money into a new business, they
must have spent enormous energy in understand the risks and rewards and then
only put forth their investments. Also,
if they were somehow paying back for the benefits received then they cannot be
well planned businessmen. If they have
invested in a growing business and add value to the ongoing operations, it is
rather obvious that they appreciate the value of their judgment and experience
in making investments.
The
whole matter of public interest should be why anyone would invest money into a
new enterprise without placing appropriate value for their money. Will they not just pay for any favors that
they might have received through middlemen, rather than putting themselves in
the glare of CBI or any other authorities.
Will it make any sense for big businesses to approach governments for
permissions and permits and not be asked for return favors? What were the corporate policing bodies doing
when the books were being built and the value of the shares being publicly registered? What will happen if every major corporate
house was to be vetted out for book building or returning favors scenarios?
It would be difficult to believe that major business leaders would make large investments without properly thinking through the process of investments. It is also inappropriate to believe that big businesses do not need any help from government in developing the infrastructure they need to continue doing business. While the decision making is normal the moral policing are looking at the market dynamics rather than the decision making of the policy makers. If the government starts to contend that book building can be done without quid pro quo then there will never be big businesses and never be start-up businesses with any potential.
No comments:
Post a Comment