Vasu
Reddy From Chicago
vasureddy@aol.com
vasureddy@aol.com
There
is so much of it available in the world; it is the equal to free air. Human beings love passing on advice to
everyone with or without asking for it. Actually
most times advice is unsolicited; it is simply given by everyone and anyone. With Internet and Mobile telephony at a
minimal cost and far reaching, it has become so common to see advice being
dished out in every language and every instance, and everyone has an opinion on
everything in the world.
When
solicited advice is useful and sometimes paid for from reliable and resourceful
and experienced people, who still do the same as they did before the advent of
communications. But whenever we open the
channels of communications, people are dishing out expert advice; be it through
twitter, face book or any other medium that is a form of free and mass
communication.
From
politicians to cricketers to movie stars and movie makers and wannabe stars
have become experts at pasting their advice to the general public and websites
are dedicated to makeup stuff for consumption of general public, and with so
much conviction on what they are saying, it really is difficult to separate the
reality verses gossip.
As
much as we enjoy the daily dishing of information on just about everybody it is
on overdrive to see a recognized person tweet or talk, and the followers
fussing over the details of what it means.
If every person who tweets or writes something can make everyone
understand what they exactly meant when they wrote the sentence, it would be a
fantastic way of communicating, but typically one writes on impulse or at the
moment and goes on to the next minute. A
lot of times when a statement is made or a sentence is written it are a general
reaction to the moment, rather than a serious study in time.
When
someone gets nominated as a member of parliament, it is not the first time or
the last time a recognized personality gets the nomination. No single person will make the entire
parliament a new place to look up to, as the house is itself a democratic
entity that functions in its fashion and environment. Each parliamentarian in their respective term
add their efforts to make it a live and vigorous environment that caters to the
needs of the public at large, and when they leave they leave a legacy of what
they have represented in the years they spent at the house of representatives.
No
one person can drive the value systems up or down, nor make immediate or effective
decisions for the well being of public.
They all do it collectively while disagreeing with each other, and also
agreeing with each other. For fact they
are all voted in or appointed with the public’s interest in mind, rather than
selfish or personal interests. What
happens from the time they get elected to the time they complete their term is
always questionable as election promises or appointments based on competence in
other areas of life, typically may not match; as they are multitude of factors
to get to the parliament and then delivering to the promises made to people; as
the availability of resources and support for making the available resources
are entirely different in reality.
We
can spend 24/7/365 in dishing out advice to the politicians and bureaucrats, but
how far are we from reality of foreseeing the reality. A old saying from a wise man was “you can
tell me whatever you want and I will do what I believe is the best thing to
do”, which is true to just about everyone.
Perhaps we should dish out a little less advice and if we do, first
practice it on our own and see if it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment