Vasu
Reddy From Chicago
vasureddy@aol.com
With television and internet covering every move of personalities and commoners at the same rate, it has become difficult to separate the important events and nonsense. Things are blown out of proportion, or continuously covered until the next incident happens. Every opportunity that even remotely resembles a conflict or a confrontation gets blown out of proportion. The latest incident involving bollywood actors and a businessman was sensationalized for days, and both parties claiming that they were provoked and the other party was guilty of enticing the fight.
vasureddy@aol.com
With television and internet covering every move of personalities and commoners at the same rate, it has become difficult to separate the important events and nonsense. Things are blown out of proportion, or continuously covered until the next incident happens. Every opportunity that even remotely resembles a conflict or a confrontation gets blown out of proportion. The latest incident involving bollywood actors and a businessman was sensationalized for days, and both parties claiming that they were provoked and the other party was guilty of enticing the fight.
It
was a fancy restaurant to have guests of repute and importance, who were able
to afford the expensive environment. The
place demanded affluence of the pocket but never of the heart or
reputation. Both parties could have
avoided the confrontation at the late hour of the night, but they chose to use
verbal abuse and fist cuffs to demonstrate the street fights, rather than
cordial deviation of conflict.
One
party asked for the CCTV footage to demonstrate the guilt of the party that
started the confrontation, but the restaurant conveniently claims that it was
not in place to give privacy to its guests.
It is the biggest farce of an excuse to either cover-up the incident or reveals
the real culprit. The restaurant should
be held accountable for having equipment that did not capture the events as
they unfolded, or having dysfunctional equipment in place. The restaurant should have equipment in place
to avoid such brawls and when they happen bring the guilty party to task so the
next time someone starts a brawl or misbehaves in public places they can be
held accountable for their actions.
Celebrities
are as human as the people who make them celebrities. They are not immune to insults or barbs when
they are in public places. They deserve
the same privacy as every other citizen does, and they don’t need to be
subjected to any abuse by the people around them, especially when they are in a
restaurant or a place where they pay for services. The expensive restaurants or hotels should
provide the comfort of service and privacy to all, along with the ability to
have a good time by all the guests.
People pay for high quality ambiance and service with these places and
celebrity or no celebrity, when one can afford to pay for eating at the place
they deserve the same attention.
It
is expected that all these places have a certain decorum with people who attend
the place, but they must be well equipped to avoid and personal confrontations
on the compound and should have the equipment to capture any kind of altercations
that might happen on their confines. Not
having the equipment or not having working equipment is never an excuse to
provide the guests with adequate protection and security on the premises. These places should publicize that they have
the security equipment in place that is to protect the guests and provide
protection, rather than invade into their privacy, and such equipment is to
provide protection. By doing so and
clearly making a point of having such equipment as a protective environment,
rather than an invasive process, the public places will be able to better serve
people who are guests who are really innocent of provocation.
The
media also should stop making a huge issue of just celebrities that get
involved in altercations, as everyone gets involved in personal aggravation. The constant attention to trying to make
someone guilty should be avoided, as stop bashing the people who name
recognition until they are found guilty of a transgression. Make the places comfortable and also secure
by having the proper equipment in place, not give excuses of equipment not
working or not having equipment.
Having
an environment that provides same level of comfort to all guests should be the
most important aspect of stopping the celebrity bashing. After all the celebrities are people who pay
for the services as anyone else, and they don’t need to be abused for just
getting out to town, and at the same time just because of their celebrity
status they cannot abuse people who are around them in a common place.
The
celebrity bashing is to an extreme by simply using an incident and trying to read
into the psychology of the person involved, and trying to dig every intricate
detail of the person’s behavior.
Whatever happened to the information prior to an altercation, and was it
not relevant to the public to know about the celebrities’ background until a
fight ensued. The level of guessing and
prying into the personal past and what transpired at the particular instance
gets in such guessing exercise; it becomes such invasive and almost abusive
process.
The
celebrities should be given the same attention as any other citizen, and no
conclusion should be drawn until the law takes its own course. The places of public domain, especially when
they charge a whole load of money to their guests should have the personnel and
equipment that protects the privacy or their guests and also attempts to keep
them safe. The celebrity bashing should
stop until the whole truth comes and the media should not try and becomes
psychoanalysts. Outside of entertaining
people, celebrities are human and they should be afforded the same respect and
privacy as anyone else in a public place.
No comments:
Post a Comment